Key Management
Key ManagementKeyManagement
Providers using this tag (32)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 32 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Key Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 47.8 | 17.9 | +29.9 | 32 |
| Contract Quality | 44.4 | 17.5 | +26.9 | 32 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.7 | 11.3 | +20.4 | 32 |
| Access Clarity | 36.4 | 22.3 | +14.1 | 32 |
| Discoverability | 73.1 | 60.4 | +12.7 | 32 |
| Contract Governance | 17 | 6.4 | +10.6 | 32 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 38% | 16% | +22 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 7% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 34% | 9% | +25 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 44% | 13% | +31 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 SAP Emarsys 66.4
- 2 IBM 62.6
- 3 KPN 61.9
- 4 Amazon KMS 61.1
- 5 Honeycomb 60
- 6 IronCore Labs 56.4
- 7 ALTR 56.3
- 8 Azure Key Vault 53.4
- 9 Oracle 53
- 10 Dynamic 51.6
- 1 ALTR 47.9
- 2 Oracle 41.9
- 3 Dream Sports 41
- 4 KPN 40.8
- 5 IBM 39.4
- 6 SAP Emarsys 37.9
- 7 Honeycomb 34
- 8 Autodesk Fusion 33.1
- 9 Dynamic 28.4
- 10 Delinea 27.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.