Equipment
Equipmentequipment
Providers using this tag (51)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (34)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 51 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Equipment, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 40.7 | 17.5 | +23.2 | 51 |
| Access Clarity | 31 | 22.3 | +8.7 | 51 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.8 | 11.3 | +6.5 | 51 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.7 | 17.9 | +5.8 | 51 |
| Discoverability | 65.8 | 60.4 | +5.4 | 51 |
| Contract Governance | 11.3 | 6.4 | +4.9 | 51 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 16% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 7% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 9% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 53% | 13% | +40 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cisco Intersight 58.7
- 2 SolarEdge 57.3
- 3 ServiceTitan 53.5
- 4 Validere 48.1
- 5 tread.io 48
- 6 University of Manchester 47.8
- 7 Maersk 47.7
- 8 Humaans 46.7
- 9 Cenevo 45.8
- 10 University of California, Davis 45.3
- 1 Validere 37.2
- 2 Cisco Intersight 34
- 3 Cenevo 32.5
- 4 University of Groningen 30.9
- 5 tread.io 29.6
- 6 Labguru 27.3
- 7 SolarEdge 26.3
- 8 United States Coast Guard 25.8
- 9 Aarhus University 25.5
- 10 City University of Hong Kong 25.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.