Container Security
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (0)
No API pages are linked for this tag yet. Search apis.io →
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 23 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Container Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 38.5 | 17.6 | +20.9 | 23 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.5 | 23.2 | +20.3 | 23 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.5 | 13.7 | +16.8 | 23 |
| Access Clarity | 41.1 | 26.5 | +14.6 | 23 |
| Discoverability | 63.6 | 58.1 | +5.5 | 23 |
| Contract Governance | 10.9 | 6.3 | +4.6 | 23 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 14% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 12% | +10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 30% | 14% | +16 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Snyk 80.6
- 2 Mend 63.4
- 3 Armor 59.4
- 4 Kondukto 59
- 5 Tigera 55.9
- 6 Amazon Inspector 55.1
- 7 Upwind 52
- 8 Scalarr 50.2
- 9 AccuKnox 49.7
- 10 Google Cloud Binary Authorization 47.9
- 1 Snyk 43.7
- 2 Upwind 41.5
- 3 Armor 40.4
- 4 Tigera 39.1
- 5 Amazon Inspector 33.7
- 6 AccuKnox 31.5
- 7 ARMO 28.4
- 8 Kondukto 28.2
- 9 Chaitin Tech 26.5
- 10 Mend 26.4
Coverage caveat. 15 of 23 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.