Container Security
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (0)
No API pages are linked for this tag yet. Search apis.io →
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 23 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Container Security, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 38.1 | 17.7 | +20.4 | 23 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.5 | 23.8 | +19.7 | 23 |
| Access Clarity | 45 | 26.5 | +18.5 | 23 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.6 | 13.2 | +16.4 | 23 |
| Discoverability | 64.3 | 58 | +6.3 | 23 |
| Contract Governance | 10.9 | 7 | +3.9 | 23 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 15% | +20 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 13% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 12% | +14 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 30% | 18% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Snyk
- 2 Mend
- 3 Kondukto
- 4 Armor
- 5 Amazon Inspector
- 6 Tigera
- 7 Root (fka Slim.ai)
- 8 AccuKnox
- 9 Upwind
- 10 Google Cloud Binary Authorization
- 1 Snyk {"score" => 45.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 2 Tigera {"score" => 42.4, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 Upwind {"score" => 40.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Armor {"score" => 36.5, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 5 Amazon Inspector {"score" => 33.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 AccuKnox {"score" => 31.5, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 7 ARMO {"score" => 28.5, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 8 Kondukto {"score" => 27.6, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 9 Root (fka Slim.ai) {"score" => 27, "band" => "agent-aware"}
- 10 Chaitin Tech {"score" => 26.8, "band" => "agent-aware"}
Coverage caveat. 17 of 23 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 2 November 2026, across 37080 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.