Patient
Patientpatient
Providers using this tag (36)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (39)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 36 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Patient, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 54.8 | 17.5 | +37.3 | 36 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.8 | 17.9 | +23.9 | 36 |
| Access Clarity | 42.8 | 22.3 | +20.5 | 36 |
| Contract Governance | 24.4 | 6.4 | +18 | 36 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.8 | 11.3 | +16.5 | 36 |
| Discoverability | 73.5 | 60.4 | +13.1 | 36 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 50% | 16% | +34 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 7% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 72% | 9% | +63 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 14% | 2% | +12 |
| Governance rules | 47% | 13% | +34 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 85.2
- 2 athenahealth 79.2
- 3 eClinicalWorks 74.9
- 4 Hint Health 73
- 5 Health Gorilla 72
- 6 Jefferson Health 71.1
- 7 Canvas Medical 70.1
- 8 Metriport 68.2
- 9 Tebra 62.2
- 10 Oracle Health (Cerner) 60.7
- 1 ModMed 52
- 2 Hint Health 44
- 3 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 4 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 39.7
- 5 NHS England 39.7
- 6 Devoted Health 39.5
- 7 Lifen 39.4
- 8 Health Gorilla 38.5
- 9 Jefferson Health 36.9
- 10 Canvas Medical 36.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/patient"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/patient"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/patient/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.