Markets · bedrock market · provisional
Public Safety and NG911 (first-responder apps, CJIS, 911)
Platform + register market (firstnet app catalog evaluation, state cjis vendor programmes). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market:
who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure.
Methodology.
27providers measured
8 (29.6%)declare their own
6 (22.2%)covered by others only
13 (48.1%)undeclared
2declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
0in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can
read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.
Where this market publishes its structure
- FirstNet App Catalog booklet (firstnet.com/apps -> apps.html -> firstnet-app-catalog-booklet.pdf, issue 03.08.2023) machine-readable, 127 app rows / ~95 providers, 106 rows with a provider website; 9 providers linked, 3 in market (everbridge, haas-alert, motorola-solutions); 6 out-of-market held; 81 candidate rows with no catalog repo
- Colorado CBI CJIS Vendor Management Program directory (cbi.colorado.gov vendor-directory, published Google Sheet) machine-readable, 619 enrolled businesses, names only; 14 linked, 3 in market (flock-safety, mark43, motorola-solutions); 11 out-of-market held; most rows are building trades / IT contractors with no catalog repo
- FirstNet App Catalog (apps.firstnet.att.com) not machine-readable: login app (FirstNet SSO); not entered. Read through the public booklet instead
- NENA i3 / NGCS member companies (nena.org) not machine-readable: Cloudflare 'Just a moment' bot challenge on every request (2026-10-20); not bypassed
- APCO Application Community / AppComm (appcomm.org) not machine-readable: appcomm.org now 301s to the APCO International home page; no app listing exists. APCO's corporate-partner and CAC member lists are not published as a list
- IJIS Institute member directory (ijis.org) not machine-readable: Cloudflare bot challenge (403 'Just a moment'); not bypassed
- Texas DPS CJIS vendor compliance not machine-readable: no public completed-vendor list; DPS says the agency, not DPS, holds the vendor's CJIS addendum
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 27 providers in this market we could resolve in the
catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside
position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| AT&T |
70.9 |
107 |
99 / 8 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
partner-built 93%, ipaas-bridge 1%, contract 1%, standard 3%, distribution 2% |
builds-on 3 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| HAAS Alert |
58.1 |
3 |
0 / 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 33%, builds-on-platform 67% |
| Everbridge |
57.1 |
6 |
0 / 6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
contract 17%, standard 33%, builds-on-platform 50% |
| AlertMedia |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
builds-on-platform 100% |
regulated 4 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Skydio |
61.7 |
4 |
0 / 4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
contract 50%, standard 25%, builds-on-platform 25% |
| Flock Safety |
50.9 |
5 |
0 / 5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
contract 40%, standard 40%, distribution 20% |
| Airspace Link |
26.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
contract 100% |
| Aloft |
26.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
contract 100% |
standard 5 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Motorola Solutions |
61.6 |
14 |
0 / 14 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
contract 21%, standard 57%, builds-on-platform 7%, distribution 14% |
| ScalpStream |
40.9 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50% |
| Coram Ai |
34.5 thin |
2 |
0 / 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 50%, builds-on-platform 50% |
| Kodex |
17.4 |
4 |
0 / 4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
| AirWise Solutions |
17.2 thin |
1 |
0 / 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
standard 100% |
mixed 1 · no single mode dominates
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|
| Mark43 |
47.6 |
6 |
0 / 6 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
contract 33%, standard 33%, distribution 33% |
undeclared 13 · declares nothing we can read: no number