Test Automation
Providers using this tag (37)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (16)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Katalon TestOps APIAPI for Katalon TestOps test automation platform, providing endpoints for test case management, test execut...Postman APIAPI for managing Postman collections, environments, monitors, mock servers, and test runs programmatically....CypressCypress is a JavaScript end-to-end testing framework designed for modern web applications. Its test scripti...Dredd API Testing FrameworkDredd is an open-source language-agnostic command-line tool for validating API documentation written in Ope...Karate API Testing FrameworkKarate is an open-source framework that combines API test automation, mocks, performance testing, and UI au...Playwright TestPlaywright is a cross-browser end-to-end testing framework from Microsoft that supports writing test script...REST AssuredREST Assured is a Java-based DSL for simplifying testing of REST services. It integrates with JUnit and Tes...Cucumber APIREST API and tooling for Cucumber BDD framework supporting test-first development with Gherkin feature file...Mabl APIManage resources in your workspace programmatically with the mabl API. By integrating mabl API endpoints in...
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
AppiumAppium is an open source automation framework for native, hybrid, and mobile web applications, exposing a W...Testing and Quality Assurance APIsAPIs for automated testing frameworks and quality assurance platforms that support unit testing, integratio...PlaywrightOpen-source framework for reliable end-to-end browser testing and web automation supporting Chromium, Firef...GalasaGalasa is an open source deep integration test framework able to run tests across z/OS, distributed systems...
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
45.4
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.0
spread across providers
Quality lift
38.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
14.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
QA 14 co-occurrences
Test Runs 9 co-occurrences
Quality Assurance 16 co-occurrences
Test Management 7 co-occurrences
Testing 25 co-occurrences
End-to-End Testing 5 co-occurrences
Software Testing 5 co-occurrences
Mobile Testing 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag30
Api tag16
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 37 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Test Automation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
37
all scored
Mean Kin Score
31.9
+11.2 vs catalog 20.7
Mean Agent Readiness
14.9
+5.2 vs catalog 9.7
Spread
6.4–61
median 33.4 · σ 15.1
How the 37 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 9Thin 12Emerging 9Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.7 | 17.9 | +17.8 | 37 |
| Operational Transparency | 23 | 11.3 | +11.7 | 37 |
| Access Clarity | 33.6 | 22.3 | +11.3 | 37 |
| Contract Quality | 28 | 17.5 | +10.5 | 37 |
| Discoverability | 70.2 | 60.4 | +9.8 | 37 |
| Contract Governance | 9.9 | 6.4 | +3.5 | 37 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 32% | 16% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 7% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 9% | -1 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 13% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Tricentis 61
- 2 Stack Moxie 60.8
- 3 Kubeshop 54.4
- 4 Rainforest QA 51.8
- 5 Opkey 48.5
- 6 Panaya 47.5
- 7 SOFY 46.5
- 8 QA Wolf 43.3
- 9 AskUI 42.4
- 10 Testim Io 42.2
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Kubeshop 50
- 2 Tricentis 44.6
- 3 SOFY 31.5
- 4 AskUI 29.9
- 5 Appium 29.4
- 6 Rainforest QA 28.2
- 7 Stack Moxie 26.4
- 8 Testim Io 24.3
- 9 QA Wolf 23.6
- 10 Opkey 23.2
All 37 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in
the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of
25 August 2026, across 26891
providers, using the same computation served by the
APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of
5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.