Azure
Providers using this tag (84)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 32 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (53)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 84 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Azure, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 42.8 | 17.5 | +25.3 | 84 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.4 | 17.9 | +15.5 | 84 |
| Discoverability | 71 | 60.4 | +10.6 | 84 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.8 | 11.3 | +10.5 | 84 |
| Access Clarity | 32.2 | 22.3 | +9.9 | 84 |
| Contract Governance | 13.7 | 6.4 | +7.3 | 84 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 16% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 7% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 50% | 9% | +41 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 54% | 13% | +41 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Azure Kubernetes Service 63.9
- 2 MediaValet 62.9
- 3 Power BI 62.9
- 4 Microsoft Azure Quantum 62.6
- 5 Microsoft Azure Functions 59.5
- 6 Datadog 57.1
- 7 Azure Container Apps 56.7
- 8 Microsoft Azure Health Data Services 55.4
- 9 Azure Blob Storage 54.3
- 10 Azure DevOps 50
- 1 Archera 51.3
- 2 Datadog 38.3
- 3 Power BI 36.3
- 4 MediaValet 34.7
- 5 Azure DevOps 34.4
- 6 Eon 33.6
- 7 Amnic 30.6
- 8 Azure Log Analytics 30.6
- 9 Veeam 29.8
- 10 Microsoft Products APIs 28.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/azure"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/azure"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/azure/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.