LeanLaw · OAuth Scopes
LeanLaw OAuth Scopes
OAuth 2.0
probed
LeanLaw uses OAuth 2.0 but publishes no discrete scopes — access is governed by the grant itself (e.g. client-credentials or role-based authorization) rather than per-scope consent.
This index is generated from the provider’s OpenAPI security definitions (and, where available, its documented scope reference) and refreshes on every APIs.io network build. Browse every provider’s scopes at scopes.apis.io.
LegalLegal BillingLaw FirmsTime TrackingBillingInvoicingAccountingTrust AccountingPractice ManagementQuickBooksPaymentsLegal TechSoftware-as-a-Service
Scopes: 0
Flows:
Method: probed
Scopes (0)
LeanLaw implements OAuth 2.0 but publishes no discrete scopes — access is governed by the grant itself (client-credentials or role-based authorization) rather than per-scope consent.
Derived from the LIVE OAuth metadata, not from the OpenAPI. The published OpenAPI declares only a `BearerAuth` (http/bearer) scheme with no oauth2 flows, so derive-oauth-scopes.py found zero scopes in the spec; the real scope surface is published in the authorization-server and protected-resource discovery documents. This is a genuine gap between LeanLaw's contract and its deployed auth.
Derived from the LIVE OAuth metadata, not from the OpenAPI. The published OpenAPI declares only a `BearerAuth` (http/bearer) scheme with no oauth2 flows, so derive-oauth-scopes.py found zero scopes in the spec; the real scope surface is published in the authorization-server and protected-resource discovery documents. This is a genuine gap between LeanLaw's contract and its deployed auth.
📄 Provider scope reference: https://platform.leanlaw.io/agents
Source
OAuth Scopes
Work with this as data
Every scope set here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.