Agent Skill · Webflow

webflow-mcp:review-comments

Review open comment threads on a Webflow site and triage each one.

Provider: Webflow Path in repo: plugins/webflow-skills/skills/review-comments/SKILL.md

Skill body

Review open comment threads on a Webflow site and triage each one.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — a site name (e.g. “Workhaus”), site ID (e.g. 6808fd4eff835ee3af009d6f), or either with the -reply flag (e.g. Workhaus -reply).

Flags:

Parse $ARGUMENTS at the start: strip -reply from the input to get the site identifier, and set replyMode = true if -reply was present, false otherwise.


Step 1 — Resolve the site

If the site identifier is empty or blank — cross-site comment survey

  1. Call data_sites_tool > list_sites to get all sites. Page through until all are collected.
  2. For each site, call data_comments_tool > list_comment_threads with isResolved: false and limit: 100. Page through until all unresolved threads are collected. If the API does not support isResolved filtering, fetch all threads and filter client-side to isResolved === false. Process sites in batches of 20 (batch multiple actions in a single tool call). After each batch completes, log a progress line: Batch {N}/{total} done (sites {start}–{end}): {summary of findings, e.g. "all 0 threads" or "SiteName has X threads, rest 0"}.
  3. For each site, compute:
    • unresolvedCount = total unresolved threads
    • newestDate = the maximum lastUpdated value across all unresolved threads for that site (ISO → human-readable date, e.g. “Apr 3, 2026”). If no threads, show .
    • oldestDate = the minimum lastUpdated value across all unresolved threads for that site (ISO → human-readable date). If no threads, show .
  4. Sort sites by unresolvedCount descending. Take the top 10.
  5. Above the table, show a heading line: ### Checked {totalSiteCount} sites — {sitesWithUnresolved} have unresolved comments.
  6. Display a table in this format (link just the site name to https://webflow.com/design/{siteId}):
| Site | Unresolved Comments | Newest / Oldest |
|------|---------------------|-----------------|
| [Site Name](https://webflow.com/design/{siteId}) ({siteId}) | {N} | {newestDate} / {oldestDate} |
  1. After the table, tell the user: “Run /webflow-mcp:review-comments <site name or ID> to review a specific site.”
  2. Write the survey output to a file:
    • Ensure comment-reviews/ exists (create with mkdir comment-reviews if not).
    • Filename: comment-reviews/triage-report-{YYYY-MM-DD-HH-MM}.md using the current local time (zero-padded).
    • File contents: a bold H1 title # **Webflow Comment Review**, then a blank line, then an H3 line ### Report created on: {human-readable date, time, and timezone, e.g. "April 16, 2026 at 10:39 AM PDT"}, then a blank line, then the H3 heading line (### Checked …) and the full table from steps 5–6 above, in markdown.
    • Log the path after writing, e.g. Report written to comment-reviews/triage-report-2026-04-16-14-30.md.
  3. Stop — do not proceed to Step 2.

If the site identifier looks like a Webflow site ID (24-char hex), use it directly.

Otherwise call data_sites_tool > list_sites and find the site whose displayName matches the identifier (case-insensitive). If no match, tell the user and stop.


Step 2 — Fetch all open threads

Always make a fresh API call here — never reuse thread data from earlier in the conversation. The user may have added or resolved comments since the last run.

Call data_comments_tool > list_comment_threads with isResolved: false and limit: 100. Page through results until all threads are collected.

Log: Site: {displayName} and Found {N} open thread(s).


Step 3 — Build page-level element map

From the already-fetched thread list, build a frequency map of elementId.element → Set<pageId> across all threads. Any elementId.element that appears on 2 or more distinct pages is almost certainly the page root/body element (a real element ID would be page-scoped; only shared structural roots repeat across pages).

No API calls needed — this is a local computation on the thread data.


Step 4 — Triage each thread

For each thread:

4a — Fetch replies

Call data_comments_tool > list_comment_replies for this thread.

4b — Dedup check

Look for replies whose content includes the string — 🤖 Comment Review Agent.

If found, note the most recent one (lastAgentReply). If no human reply exists with a createdOn after lastAgentReply.createdOn, skip this thread (increment skipped count, continue to next thread).

4c — Compute element context

4d — Classify the thread

Use the following criteria:

noise — No real design or engineering value:

stale — Real concern, but old and likely handled:

open — Real, actionable concern needing attention:

page-level — Comment is on the page root, not a specific element:

4e — Compose reply

Always compose the reply text (it appears in the report regardless of mode):

Append \n\n— 🤖 Comment Review Agent to every reply text.

4f — Post reply (only if replyMode = true)

If replyMode is true and verdict is not open, call data_comments_tool > create_reply with the composed reply content.

Log each thread as:

{VERDICT_EMOJI} {verdict}  "{preview (60 chars)}"
                {one-sentence classification reason}
                ↳ {reply posted | no reply — report only | skipped}

Verdict emojis: noise = 🗑, stale = 🕰, open = 🔴, page-level = 📄


Step 5 — Write the report

After processing all threads:

  1. Check whether a comment-reviews/ directory exists at the top level of the working directory. If it does not exist, create it with mkdir comment-reviews.
  2. Write a markdown report to comment-reviews/{slugified-site-name}-comments-triage-report.md (lowercase, hyphens, no special chars).

Report format:

# Comment Review — [{siteName} ({siteId})](https://webflow.com/design/{siteId})

**Run:** {human-readable date and time}
**Mode:** {Report only | Report + replies posted}
**Threads:** {total} total | 🔴 {open} open | 🕰 {stale} stale | 📄 {page-level} page-level | 🗑 {noise} noise | ⏭ {skipped} skipped

---

## 🔴 Needs Attention ({count})

| Comment | Author | Age | Link |
|---------|--------|-----|------|
| "{first 80 chars of content}" | {author.name} | {age in days}d | [Open ↗]({thread.url}) |

## 🕰 Stale — Candidates to Resolve ({count})

| Comment | Author | Age | Suggested Reply | Link |
|---------|--------|-----|-----------------|------|
| "{first 80 chars of content}" | {author.name} | {age in days}d | {composed reply text, without the `— 🤖 Comment Review Agent` suffix} | [Open ↗]({thread.url}) |

## 📄 Page-level — Not Anchored to a Specific Element ({count})

| Comment | Author | Age | Suggested Reply | Link |
|---------|--------|-----|-----------------|------|
...

---

**🗑 Noise:** {count} thread(s) — {if replyMode: "replied to" | if report-only: "suggested replies in report"}. Safe to bulk-resolve.

Use _None._ for any section with no entries.

Log a summary line and confirm the report path.

Work with this as data

Every skill here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for agent skills

4 MCP tools reach this
  • find_skillsBrowse and filter every skill in the catalog.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This skill
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/skills/webflow-mcp-review-comments"
All agent skills
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/skills?limit=25"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no email required.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.