Adding Model Support to NeMo AutoModel

Purpose

This skill guides implementation of new model architectures in NeMo AutoModel. Follow the five phases in order.

Instructions

When answering an onboarding question, keep the response in this order:

1. Classify the architecture from config.json.
2. Name the exact implementation files under components/models/<name>/.
3. Identify registry and optional custom-config updates.
4. State the validation tests that must be added before full checkpoint use.

For conceptual onboarding questions, answer from this skill without opening the pattern files unless the user asks you to edit code. Mention pattern filenames as references, then give the direct checklist.

Use direct action verbs: classify the model, name the files, map the weights, register the class, and add tests. Do not discuss distributed strategy, launcher configuration, or general recipe authoring unless the user explicitly connects it to onboarding a new architecture.

Examples

Use these compact answer patterns for common questions:

• Dense causal LM: classify as dense only when architectures contains a ForCausalLM class and expert fields such as num_local_experts, n_routed_experts, or num_experts_per_tok are absent. Create components/models/<name>/model.py, state_dict_adapter.py, __init__.py, and optional config.py, register MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in _transformers/registry.py, add example YAML, and add tiny-config unit tests plus layer-equivalence tests for rewritten layers.
• MoE state dict: identify expert fields in config.json, reference moe-patterns.md, map router tensors separately, preserve routed-expert index order, map routed experts, shared experts, and gate/up/down projections, add adapter key-map tests and tiny-config numerical equivalence tests, and do not rely only on from_pretrained() or silent tensor reshapes.
• VLM onboarding: classify as VLM only when vision_config, text_config, and a ForConditionalGeneration architecture are present. Reference vlm-patterns.md and existing VLM implementations such as mistral4, kimivl, or kimi_k25_vl; check text backbone, vision tower, projector, processor assumptions, text and vision state_dict_adapter.py mappings, registry registration, and tiny image-text tests before full checkpoints. Do not treat VLM onboarding as a pure causal-LM path or skip processor/image tests.

For MoE state-dict questions, always include the safety checklist:

• Map router tensors separately from expert tensors.
• Preserve routed-expert index order; never sort, drop, merge, or silently reshape expert weights to make loading pass.
• Map gate, up, and down projections explicitly, including combined projection layouts and shared experts when present.
• Add adapter key-map tests and tiny-config numerical equivalence tests before relying on full checkpoint loading.

For VLM questions, explicitly check vision_config, text_config, the conditional-generation architecture, text backbone, vision tower, projector, processor assumptions, registry entry, and tiny image-text tests.

Routing Boundary

Use this skill only when the user is adding or modifying model architecture support: model files, custom layers, state-dict adapters, Hugging Face config mapping, registry entries, or model capability flags.

Do not use this skill for standalone training recipe YAML questions about optimizers, datasets, schedulers, validation datasets, or trainer wiring unless they are explicitly part of onboarding a new model architecture. Those recipe questions belong to the nemo-automodel-recipe-development skill.

In-scope examples:

• “Add support for a new Hugging Face causal LM architecture.”
• “Map MoE router and expert weights from a Hugging Face checkpoint.”
• “Register a new model class in NeMo AutoModel.”

Out-of-scope examples:

• “Write a finetuning recipe YAML with optimizer and dataset sections.”
• “Choose FSDP2, DDP, tensor parallel, or context parallel settings.”
• “Configure Slurm, SkyPilot, containers, mounts, or launch dispatch.”

Phase 1: Discovery

Before writing code, gather information about the target model.

1.1 Fetch HuggingFace config.json

Download the model’s config.json from the HuggingFace Hub (or use AutoConfig.from_pretrained). Key fields to extract:

• architectures – determines the class name and registration key (e.g., "LlamaForCausalLM", "Qwen3MoeForCausalLM", "Mistral3ForConditionalGeneration")
• model_type – used for custom config registration in _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS if HF does not have a built-in config class
• hidden_size, intermediate_size, num_hidden_layers, num_attention_heads, num_key_value_heads – sizing
• vocab_size – needed for tiny test configs
• tie_word_embeddings – whether lm_head shares weights with embed_tokens
• hidden_act – activation function (e.g., "silu" for SwiGLU)

1.2 Determine model type

1.3 Check for existing similar architectures

Look in components/models/ for architectures with similar attention or MLP patterns:

components/models/
  llama/           # Standard GQA + SwiGLU (CombinedQKV + CombinedGateUpMLP)
  qwen2/           # Same as Llama but with attention bias + QKV bias
  baichuan/        # ALiBi attention variant
  deepseek_v3/     # MLA attention + MoE (DeepSeek-style grouped experts)
  mistral4/        # MLA + MoE + VLM (Pixtral vision)
  kimivl/          # DeepSeek-V3 backbone + MoonVit vision
  kimi_k25_vl/     # Updated KimiVL with different projector
  qwen3_moe/       # Qwen3 with MoE layers
  nemotron_v3/     # Hybrid mamba-attention

1.4 Identify custom components

Check whether the model needs:

• Custom attention: GQA (standard), MLA (DeepSeek/Mistral4), sliding window, bidirectional
• Custom RoPE: Standard (Llama), YaRN scaling, NTK-aware, complex-number (DeepSeek)
• Custom normalization: RMSNorm (standard), LayerNorm, different eps values
• Custom MLP: SwiGLU (standard), GeGLU, ReLU-squared, MoE routing
• Custom config class: Needed only if HF AutoConfig cannot parse the model’s config.json (check auto_map field)

1.5 Note dimensions for test config

For unit tests, create a tiny config. Target: ~1M parameters or less.

# Example tiny config for a Llama-like model:
tiny_config = LlamaConfig(
    hidden_size=64,
    intermediate_size=128,
    num_hidden_layers=2,
    num_attention_heads=4,
    num_key_value_heads=2,
    vocab_size=256,
    max_position_embeddings=128,
)

Phase 2: Implementation

2.1 Create directory structure

components/models/<name>/
  __init__.py
  model.py
  state_dict_adapter.py
  config.py            # Only if HF config is insufficient
  layers.py            # Only for MoE / MLA / other non-standard layers
  rope_utils.py        # Only for custom RoPE

2.2 Implementation order

Implement files in dependency order:

1. config.py (if needed) – Custom PretrainedConfig subclass
2. rope_utils.py (if needed) – RoPE implementation
3. layers.py (if needed) – Attention, MLP, decoder block classes
4. model.py – The main ForCausalLM (or ForConditionalGeneration) class
5. state_dict_adapter.py – HF weight conversion
6. __init__.py – Re-export the main model class

See the pattern files for detailed implementation guidance:

• Dense LLM: llm-patterns.md
• MoE: moe-patterns.md
• VLM: vlm-patterns.md

2.3 MoE state-dict adapter checklist

For MoE models, do not stop at generic loading. The adapter must explicitly map:

• Router weights, including gate bias or correction-bias tensors when the Hugging Face model has them.
• Expert weights, preserving expert index order across local and routed experts.
• Gate/up/down projections, including combined or split projection layouts.
• Shared experts separately from routed experts when the architecture has both.

Add tests that assert expected key mappings and run numerical equivalence with tiny configs before trying full checkpoints.

Do not use these shortcuts:

• Do not validate the adapter only by calling from_pretrained().
• Do not accept missing or extra expert keys without an explicit mapping reason.
• Do not change dtype, transpose dimensions, or reshape tensors unless the HF and NeMo layouts require it and a test proves the conversion is reversible.
• Do not skip router or shared-expert tests because dense-layer tests pass.

2.4 VLM onboarding checklist

For VLMs, confirm the Hugging Face config has vision_config and text_config and that architectures points to a conditional-generation class. Start from the closest VLM pattern file, usually vlm-patterns.md, and compare existing implementations such as mistral4, kimivl, or kimi_k25_vl.

The implementation should explicitly cover:

• Text backbone, vision tower, projector, and processor or image preprocessing assumptions.
• Weight mapping for both text and vision modules in state_dict_adapter.py.
• Registration of the ForConditionalGeneration class in _transformers/registry.py.
• Tiny tests that exercise image-text inputs and verify the adapter round-trip.

2.5 Register in registry

Add the model to MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in _transformers/registry.py:

# In _transformers/registry.py
MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING = OrderedDict([
    # ... existing entries ...
    (
        "NewModelForCausalLM",
        ("nemo_automodel.components.models.new_model.model", "NewModelForCausalLM"),
    ),
])

If the model has a custom config class with auto_map in its config.json, also register in _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS:

_CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS: Dict[str, Tuple[str, str]] = {
    # ... existing entries ...
    "new_model": ("nemo_automodel.components.models.new_model.configuration", "NewModelConfig"),
}

Phase 3: Onboarding Example Config

This phase is only for adding a minimal example config that proves the newly onboarded architecture can load and run. Use nemo-automodel-recipe-development for general recipe authoring or existing recipe modifications.

3.1 Create example YAML config

Create an example config under examples/llm_finetune/<name>/ (or examples/vlm_finetune/<name>/):

model:
  _target_: nemo_automodel.NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained
  pretrained_model_name_or_path: <org>/<model-name>

trainer:
  max_steps: 100
  gradient_clip_val: 1.0
  accumulate_grad_batches: 1

# ... data, optimizer config ...

3.2 Verify model loads

Test that the model loads from a HuggingFace checkpoint:

from nemo_automodel import NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM

model = NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("<org>/<model-name>")

3.3 Test with tiny config first

Before using full-size models, verify with a tiny config (1-2 layers, small hidden dim) to catch shape mismatches early.

Phase 4: Tests

Create tests/unit_tests/models/<name>/ and cover the checks below before loading full checkpoints:

• Forward-shape smoke test with a tiny config.
• State-dict adapter round-trip: from_hf -> to_hf preserves mapped names, shapes, dtypes, and values.
• Layer equivalence tests for every rewritten attention, MLP, normalization, RoPE, or MoE layer. Use the model dtype from config, identical seeded weights, identical inputs, and dtype-appropriate torch.allclose tolerances.
• Short functional test that verifies loss decreases over a few training steps.

Phase 5: Documentation

5.1 Update model coverage page

Edit the appropriate file in docs/model-coverage/:

• LLM/MoE: docs/model-coverage/llm/index.md
• VLM: docs/model-coverage/vlm/index.md

Add a row with the model name, supported features (TP, PP, FSDP, LoRA, QLoRA), and any limitations.

Phase 6: Parity Testing

After implementation and unit tests are complete, run the full parity-testing workflow to verify that the new model produces numerically equivalent results to the reference HuggingFace implementation.

Run three levels of comparison:

1. State-dict round-trip: load a reference HuggingFace checkpoint, convert it into the NeMo AutoModel layout, export it back, and verify that all mapped tensors match the reference names, shapes, dtypes, and values within the expected tolerance.
2. Component-level parity: compare rewritten attention, MLP, normalization, RoPE, and MoE components against the HuggingFace implementation with fixed seeds and identical dtype.
3. End-to-end forward pass: run the full NeMo AutoModel and HuggingFace model on the same tokenized input and compare logits, hidden states, and loss.

Do not skip this phase. A model that passes unit tests can still diverge from HF due to subtle weight-conversion bugs, backend differences, or RoPE mismatches that only surface in a full parity comparison.

Key Files Reference

Checklist

• Fetched and analyzed config.json from HuggingFace
• Determined model type (dense LLM / MoE / VLM)
• Identified custom components (attention, RoPE, normalization, MLP)
• Created components/models/<name>/ directory
• Implemented config.py (if custom config needed)
• Implemented layers.py (if custom layers needed)
• Implemented rope_utils.py (if custom RoPE needed)
• Implemented model.py with HFCheckpointingMixin
• Implemented state_dict_adapter.py
• Implemented init.py with re-export
• Registered in MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in _transformers/registry.py
• Registered custom config in _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS (if applicable)
• Created example YAML config
• Verified model loads via NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained()
• Created unit tests (forward shape, state_dict round-trip)
• Created layer equivalence tests for every rewritten layer (matching model dtype)
• Created functional tests (training loss decreases)
• Updated docs/model-coverage page
• Ran state-dict round-trip, component parity, and E2E forward-pass parity checks
• Set ModelClass = <Name>ForCausalLM at module bottom