# User Stories

**Canonical:** https://apis.io/providers/user-stories/  
**Website:** https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/user-stories  
**APIs profiled:** 0

A curated collection of API user stories following agile methodology formats. User stories capture software requirements from the end-user perspective using the format "As a [user], I want [goal], so that [benefit]". This repository indexes user story patterns for API consumers and producers across product management, developer experience, integration design, and platform engineering contexts. Teams use these to align stakeholders, prioritize API features, track progress, and adapt to evolving requirements throughout the API lifecycle.

## Kin Score — 11.9 / 100 (emerging)

Scored 2026-08-20 under rubric 0.12.0. Trend: flat (+0.0 from 11.9).

| Facet | Score |
|---|---|
| Discoverability | 50.0 |
| Contract Quality | 11.3 |
| Governance | 15.2 |
| Contract Governance | 15.2 |
| Operational Transparency | 5.3 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 0.0 |
| Commercial Clarity | 7.9 |
| Access Clarity | 7.9 |

## Agent readiness — 0.0 (human-only)

| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Spec Presence | no |
| Agentic Access | no |
| Reversibility Documented | no |
| MCP Server | no |
| Auth Clarity | no |
| Idempotency | no |
| Error Semantics | no |
| OpenAPI Examples | no |
| Rate Limit Signal | no |
| Event Surface Described | no |
| Agent Skills | no |
| Well Known Catalog | no |
| Consent Identity | no |
| Agent Card | no |
| Dry Run Mode | no |

## Access

Unknown — onboarding: unknown, pricing: unknown, trial: no (confidence: low).

## Security (3)

- **User Stories Domain Security** — TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DNSSEC · DMARC
- **User Stories Vulnerability Disclosure** — security.txt · contact published
- **User Stories Trust Center** — FedRAMP

## Tags

Agile, API Design, Developer Experience, Product Management, Requirements, User Needs

---

Profiled by [API Evangelist](https://apievangelist.com) and published on [APIs.io](https://apis.io/providers/user-stories/). Scores are computed from the provider's own public artifacts under a published rubric.