# Qt

**Canonical:** https://apis.io/providers/qt/  
**Website:** https://www.qt.io  
**APIs profiled:** 0

Qt Group is a global software company that builds cross-platform development, design, and quality-assurance tools used across more than 70 industries and billions of devices. Its portfolio spans the Qt Framework (cross-platform C++ software libraries and APIs), the Qt Creator IDE, Qt for MCUs, Qt Design Studio, and the quality-assurance suite (Squish GUI test automation, Coco code coverage, Test Center, and Axivion static analysis). Qt does not publish a public REST/HTTP API; its "APIs" are C++/QML/Python library APIs shipped with the framework, with the official Python bindings (PySide6/PySide2) distributed on PyPI. Documentation, learning, and support are provided through doc.qt.io, the Qt Academy, and forum.qt.io.

## Kin Score — 19.0 / 100 (emerging)

Scored 2026-08-20 under rubric 0.12.0. Trend: flat (+0.0 from 19.0).

| Facet | Score |
|---|---|
| Discoverability | 50.0 |
| Contract Quality | 0.0 |
| Governance | 0.0 |
| Contract Governance | 0.0 |
| Operational Transparency | 2.6 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.8 |
| Commercial Clarity | 44.7 |
| Access Clarity | 44.7 |

## Agent readiness — 0.0 (human-only)

| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Spec Presence | no |
| Agentic Access | no |
| Reversibility Documented | no |
| MCP Server | no |
| Auth Clarity | no |
| Idempotency | no |
| Error Semantics | no |
| OpenAPI Examples | no |
| Rate Limit Signal | no |
| Event Surface Described | no |
| Agent Skills | no |
| Well Known Catalog | no |
| Consent Identity | no |
| Agent Card | no |
| Dry Run Mode | no |

## Access

Unknown — onboarding: unknown, pricing: unknown, trial: no (confidence: low).

## Security (1)

- **Qt Domain Security** — TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

## Tags

Company, Enterprise, Developer Tools, Cross-Platform, Framework, SDK, IDE, Quality Assurance, UI Design, Embedded

---

Profiled by [API Evangelist](https://apievangelist.com) and published on [APIs.io](https://apis.io/providers/qt/). Scores are computed from the provider's own public artifacts under a published rubric.