# CourtDrive

**Canonical:** https://apis.io/providers/courtdrive/  
**Website:** https://courtdrive.com/  
**APIs profiled:** 1

CourtDrive provides an AI‑powered docketing assistant for law firms, automating federal and state court e‑notice handling, calendaring, and document management integration. The platform offers free docket access, AI‑driven deadline calculation, and seamless syncing with systems like iManage, NetDocuments, Clio, Google Drive, and more, helping legal teams save time and reduce errors.

## Kin Score — 22.5 / 100 (emerging)

Scored 2026-10-31 under rubric 0.25.0.

| Facet | Score |
|---|---|
| Discoverability | 57.1 |
| Contract Quality | 0.0 |
| Contract Governance | 0.0 |
| Operational Transparency | 0.0 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 9.5 |
| Access Clarity | 76.3 |

Regulatory layer — **Horizontal (data, software, accessibility, platform)**: 12.7 (matched via fallback).

## Agent readiness — 2.9 (human-only)

| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Spec Presence | no |
| Agentic Access | no |
| Reversibility Documented | no |
| MCP Server | no |
| Auth Clarity | no |
| Idempotency | no |
| Error Semantics | no |
| OpenAPI Examples | no |
| Rate Limit Signal | no |
| Event Surface Described | no |
| Agent Skills | no |
| Well Known Catalog | yes |
| Consent Identity | no |
| Agent Card | no |
| Dry Run Mode | no |
| Delegated Identity | no |
| Protected Resource Metadata | no |
| Dynamic Client Registration | no |
| Agentic Commerce | no |
| Pagination Ratio | na |
| Operation Distinctiveness | na |

## APIs (1)

- **CourtDrive API** — CourtDrive provides an AI‑powered docketing assistant API (no public machine‑readable contract found).

## Security (1)

- **Courtdrive Domain Security** — TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

## Plans (1)

- **Courtdrive Plans Pricing**

## Tags

LegalTech, AI, Docketing, Automation, DocumentManagement, Company

---

Profiled by [API Evangelist](https://apievangelist.com) and published on [APIs.io](https://apis.io/providers/courtdrive/). Scores are computed from the provider's own public artifacts under a published rubric.
