# Ashley Payne

**Canonical:** https://apis.io/providers/ashleypayne-co-uk/  
**Website:** https://www.ashleypayne.co.uk/  
**APIs profiled:** 0

Ashley Payne is a fractional CTO and technical co‑founder offering AI‑enabled software solutions, diagnostics, and consulting. He helps businesses define technical strategy, build bespoke SaaS platforms, and implement AI automation, focusing on data‑driven decision making and scalable architecture.

## Kin Score — 6.0 / 100 (minimal)

Scored 2026-11-02 under rubric 0.26.0.

| Facet | Score |
|---|---|
| Discoverability | 48.3 |
| Contract Quality | 0.0 |
| Contract Governance | 0.0 |
| Operational Transparency | 0.0 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 0.0 |
| Access Clarity | 10.5 |

Regulatory layer — **Horizontal (data, software, accessibility, platform)**: 9.1 (matched via fallback).

## Agent readiness — 6.3 (agent-aware)

| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Spec Presence | no |
| Agentic Access | no |
| Reversibility Documented | no |
| MCP Server | documented |
| Auth Clarity | no |
| Idempotency | no |
| Error Semantics | no |
| OpenAPI Examples | no |
| Rate Limit Signal | no |
| Event Surface Described | no |
| Agent Skills | no |
| Well Known Catalog | yes |
| Consent Identity | no |
| Agent Card | no |
| Dry Run Mode | no |
| Delegated Identity | no |
| Protected Resource Metadata | no |
| Dynamic Client Registration | no |
| Agentic Commerce | no |
| Pagination Ratio | na |
| Operation Distinctiveness | na |
| MCP Tool Quality | na |

## Access

Unknown — onboarding: unknown, pricing: unknown, trial: no (confidence: low).

## MCP servers (1)

- **Ashley Payne MCP Server** — Remote MCP server at www.ashleypayne.co.uk.

## Security (1)

- **Ashleypayne Co Uk Domain Security** — TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

## Tags

Consulting, Artificial Intelligence, Fractional-CTO, Software Engineering, United Kingdom

---

Profiled by [API Evangelist](https://apievangelist.com) and published on [APIs.io](https://apis.io/providers/ashleypayne-co-uk/). Scores are computed from the provider's own public artifacts under a published rubric.
